Trying to separate three different claims about ligandrol: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
Mechanism is not outcome, and a plausible pathway is the most expensive kind of evidence there is.
Sample size, blinding, and who paid for it. Those three questions kill most of the confidence in most of these threads.
Lipids move and nobody checks them, which is why SARMs have a reputation for being harmless.
Would like a narrow answer rather than an enthusiastic one.
Most of the popular protocol is borrowed from a clinical population and applied to healthy people without comment.
Name the active ingredient, not just the brand. It makes these threads searchable years later.
Cold storage, light protection, date on the vial. Boring, removes half the variables.
Same here.
Same here.