I have been running cardarine for three years and the honest summary is that the effect is smaller than the internet suggests and real.
My rule now: if a claim cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
I would rather have a narrow conclusion and be right than a broad one and be interesting.
Lipids move and nobody checks them, which is why SARMs have a reputation for being harmless.
Curious whether the popular dose has any basis or is just the convenient one.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
Same here.
Three years in on cardarine and it lines up.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.