Trying to separate three different claims about drostanolone propionate: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
Sample size, blinding, and who paid for it. Those three questions kill most of the confidence in most of these threads.
The effect size I actually noticed is roughly a third of what the write-ups imply, and it took five years to be sure.
There is a serious question about whether the studied form matches what is sold, and nobody in a thread can answer it.
Mechanism is not outcome, and a plausible pathway is the most expensive kind of evidence there is.
Bloodwork before opinions. Everything else here is a guess with better marketing.
Posting to be argued with, mainly.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this? How long have you been on drostanolone propionate?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing. Raised haematocrit was my main issue with drostanolone propionate too.