I have been running hCG for two years and the honest summary is that the effect is smaller than the internet suggests and real.
Vivid dreams and mild headache for the first 13 days, then nothing. Textbook for this class, apparently.
If you need three other compounds to notice the first one, you have not tested the first one.
The interesting question is not whether it works but for whom and at what cost.
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial.
I would take the narrow conclusion. Broad ones are more interesting and less true.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread. Two years in on hCG and it lines up.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Cold storage, light protection, date on the vial. Boring, removes half the variables.
Narrow conclusion. How long have you been on hCG?
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything. How long have you been on hCG?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.