Start with your question. Search first, choose the closest subject and keep personal details private. Posting guidelines
Notifications
Clear all
Anabolic Steroids & Performance
2
Posts
2
Users
0
Reactions
463
Views
Topic starter
01/01/2022 11:29 am
Meta-level question: how do you evaluate evidence for clomiphene when the human data is thin and most trials are small?
Mechanism is not outcome, and a plausible pathway is the most expensive kind of evidence there is.
If you need three other compounds to notice the first one, you have not tested the first one.
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
The comparison group matters more than the compound when the outcome is something as fuzzy as focus.
What is the strongest human evidence anyone here has actually read, not skimmed?
01/01/2022 12:13 pm
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four. Not on clomiphene but the pattern is familiar.