Bloodwork question about methandienone. Baseline, eight months in, and the numbers moved in a direction I did not expect.
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid.
Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Baseline first.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at. Same for me with methandienone, unfortunately.