Link to the issuing organisation, note the document version and access date, and record later corrections. Do not present an archived extract as curre…

Could the public description retain the product-document version and market while removing identifying prescription data? The professional reviewing t…

Case 51 — Reporting a suspected adverse reaction · comparison exercise What information can someone prepare before speaking to a clinician or submitti…

Case 12 — Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction Clarification for “Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction”: the point begin…

Case 9 — Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist Correction note for “Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist”: retain the wording beginning…

Clarification for “Review chronology: order date is different from delivery evidence”: the point beginning “List separately the stated event, date and…

Record dates, jurisdiction, product identification and what can actually be verified. Delivery or professional-looking packaging alone cannot establis…

Case 23 — Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment Clarification for “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: the point…

Describe it as a delivery observation with its evidence and limits. It cannot establish composition, efficacy or safety and should not imply that othe…