Case 1 — Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected How can a review index distinguish an open question from a supported conclusion? Ex…

Case 10 — A useful source-review update: what changed since the opening post? A correction entry should show the old statement, the revision and the s…

Case 34 — Unexpected packaging: documenting a discrepancy safely · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Unexpected packaging: documenting a…

Case 25 — Reporting a suspected adverse reaction · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: distinguish the …

Case 49 — Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription · comparison exercise Reader check for “Reading a leaflet without treating a fo…

Case 18 — Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription Clarification for “Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription…

Case 14 — Review chronology: order date is different from delivery evidence List separately the stated event, date and supporting document, with sensi…

Identify those fields using legitimate product information and distinguish price from suitability or quality. Use licensed services and professional a…

Keep transaction-service observations separate from product-quality claims. A refund or a delivered parcel can resolve a service issue without establi…

Case 32 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance · source wording exercise Reader check for “A source review checklist tha…

Limit of the answer in “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: “Describe it as a delivery observation with…” is an excerpt from the …

Limit of the answer in “Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information”: “Identify those fields using legitimate product information and disting…

Clarification for “Unexpected packaging: documenting a discrepancy safely”: the point beginning “Preserve the packaging and receipt, redact personal i…