Case 23 — Conflicting advice: identify the original source Correction note for “Conflicting advice: identify the original source”: retain the wording …

Summary draft for “Conflicting advice: identify the original source”: the answer addresses “Ask for the official product information or relevant…”; th…

Case 31 — Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Price comparisons: compare like-for-like i…

Limit of the answer in “Official information: save the version and access date”: “Link to the issuing organisation, note the document version and…” is…

Case 11 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? Batch and product information may be relevant to a pharmacist or regulator. Decide wh…

Identify the specific statement, explain the evidence gap and link authoritative information where available. Preserve a dated correction and avoid su…

Case 24 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict Record the two markings exactly, identify which packaging layer ea…

Case 18 — Reporting a suspected adverse reaction Method note for “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: use “Record the product, timing and a factu…

Case 33 — Privacy in medicine photographs · source wording exercise Reader check for “Privacy in medicine photographs”: distinguish the discussion poi…

Quote a short relevant phrase and identify the official leaflet version without sharing private details. Ask a pharmacist to explain how it applies to…

Clarification for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: the point beginning “Identify the specific statement, explain the evidence gap and…” be…

Clarification for “Keeping a medication list for an appointment”: the point beginning “Keep names, formulation, prescribed instructions and relevant q…

Case 25 — Review moderation: evidence without doxxing · source wording exercise Correction note for “Review moderation: evidence without doxxing”: ret…