Case 6 — Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction Limit of the answer in “Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction”: “Use the of…

Clarification for “Conflicting advice: identify the original source”: the point beginning “Ask for the official product information or relevant…” belo…

Case 26 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance · source wording exercise Correction note for “A source review checklist …

Case 12 — Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist A question lists several products but gives no clear concern. How can it be organised for a pro…

Case 21 — Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment Clarification for “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: the point…

Describe it as a delivery observation with its evidence and limits. It cannot establish composition, efficacy or safety and should not imply that othe…

Case 29 — Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing · source wording exercise Correction note for “Discontinued packaging versus an unverifi…

Image metadata can also contain sensitive information. Check the exported file with a suitable metadata viewer and share only the copy you have inspec…

Case 24 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict Record the two markings exactly, identify which packaging layer ea…

The acceptance scan is evidence of the recorded acceptance event, but missing earlier scans do not prove exactly when handover occurred. Describe that…

Case 33 — A dated correction to a source discussion · source wording exercise Correction note for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: retain …

Keep original records privately, redact personal information in public and describe only verifiable events. Avoid personal allegations or claims about…