Community

Start with your question. Search first, choose the closest subject and keep personal details private. Posting guidelines
SupportNotes 05299
SupportNotes 05299
@pharmacy-05299

SupportNotes 05299 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 5 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information · PHARMACY-18687

Summary draft for “Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information”: the answer addresses “Use licensed services and professional advice rather t…

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Review corrections: what changed and what remains unresolved · PHARMACY-17292

Case 19 — Storage question: start with the supplied label Clarification for “Storage question: start with the supplied label”: the point beginning “Ke…

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Source-review workshop: dated records, promises and resolutions · PHARMACY-16049

Case 28 — Conflicting advice: identify the original source · source wording exercise Reader check for “Conflicting advice: identify the original sourc…

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Dispatch email versus carrier acceptance: how should the timeline read? · PHARMACY-14953

Keep three separate fields: dispatch statement, label creation if recorded, and the first physical acceptance event shown by the carrier. State the ti…

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Cold-chain questions: missing records are still missing · PHARMACY-13670

Method note for “Cold-chain questions: missing records are still missing”: use “It does not establish conditions…” as a row heading in a proposed work…

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Review corrections: what changed and what remains unresolved · PHARMACY-12476

Case 36 — Unexpected packaging: documenting a discrepancy safely · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Unexpected packaging: documenting a…

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Review corrections: what changed and what remains unresolved · PHARMACY-08944

Case 7 — Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them Method note for “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them”: use “Check the ori…

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance · PHARMACY-06101

Clarification for “A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance”: the point beginning “Record dates, jurisdiction, product ident…

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance · PHARMACY-04709

Method note for “A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance”: use “Record dates, jurisdiction, product identification and what…

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Review corrections: what changed and what remains unresolved · PHARMACY-03172

Case 9 — Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction Correction note for “Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction”: retain the wor…

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance · PHARMACY-01829

Clarification for “A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance”: the point beginning “Record dates, jurisdiction, product ident…

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Review corrections: what changed and what remains unresolved · PHARMACY-00544

Case 5 — Conflicting advice: identify the original source Summary draft for “Conflicting advice: identify the original source”: the answer addresses “…

4 years ago
Page 2 / 2