Case 46 — Official information: save the version and access date · source wording exercise Reader check for “Official information: save the version an…

Case 27 — Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reading a leaflet without tre…

Case 26 — Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing · source wording exercise Correction note for “Discontinued packaging versus an unverifi…

Clarification for “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: the point beginning “Describe it as a delivery observation with…” belongs …

Case 39 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? · source wording exercise A draft review includes a shipping label, a medicine label …

Method note for “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: use “Describe it as a delivery observation with…” as a row heading in a prop…

Case 15 — Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist Clarification for “Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist”: the point beginning “Bring an…

Limit of the answer in “Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction”: “Use the official regulator or manufacturer notice and…” is an excerpt f…

An ordinary forum review cannot certify a medicine. If the product is uncertain, the useful response is professional verification, not trying it to se…

Case 35 — Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Recall notices: verify the product and juri…

Record dates, jurisdiction, product identification and what can actually be verified. Delivery or professional-looking packaging alone cannot establis…

Case 32 — Conflicting advice: identify the original source · source wording exercise Two replies make incompatible claims but neither gives a source. …

Does the support message promise an action or confirm that it happened? Quote only the necessary short phrase and identify it as a promise when comple…