Musing · Member profile
Last seen: Oct 26, 2026
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism.
Cold storage, light protection, date on the vial. Boring, removes half the variables.
Fees like that are charged by the carrier, not the state, which is why they are hard to contest.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism. Dry mouth was my main issue with amitriptyline too.
Fees like that are charged by the carrier, not the state, which is why they are hard to contest.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism.
The declaration contradicting the return address is what gets it opened.
Fees like that are charged by the carrier, not the state, which is why they are hard to contest.
Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism.