Musing · Member profile
Last seen: Oct 26, 2026
Clear, thanks. That’s a sensible line.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism.
Fees like that are charged by the carrier, not the state, which is why they are hard to contest.
Interdose restlessness is distinct from the original symptom and worth naming separately.
Interdose restlessness is distinct from the original symptom and worth naming separately. Currently on a coated tablet with no imprint myself.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism.
Interdose restlessness is distinct from the original symptom and worth naming separately.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable. Currently on a laptop battery myself.
Fees like that are charged by the carrier, not the state, which is why they are hard to contest.
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.
Fees like that are charged by the carrier, not the state, which is why they are hard to contest.
The declaration contradicting the return address is what gets it opened. Not on FedEx but the pattern is familiar.