Proposal about a region filter for the moderators and anyone who cares.
The short version is that the rule exists because of a specific pattern of posts.
Nothing here is a rule for its own sake, which is why the odd ones have a paragraph attached.
Linking a regulator beats linking a blog, and it is not close.
Disclosure in the first line saves a moderator five minutes and a member an argument.
Curious what the moderators think.
Small wins count. Walking to the mailbox is a data point.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.
Small wins count. Walking to the mailbox is a data point.
The rule exists because of a specific pattern of posts, and it is always that pattern. How long have you been on a region filter?
Ten percent cuts. Slower is faster.
Did not know half of this. Thanks.
Two accounts, one person, is the usual explanation when this comes up.
Small wins count. Walking to the mailbox is a data point.
Same here.
Three weeks in on a region filter and it lines up.
My pharmacist has become my actual doctor and I am at peace with it.
Did not know half of this. Thanks.
Half these threads would be unnecessary with a functioning search box.
Fifteen years of this and the function column is the only one that changed anything for me. Also, one page of history, printed, handed over at the start. It changes the appointment.
Same here.