The rule exists because of a specific pattern of posts, and it is always that pattern.

Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism.

Two accounts, one person, is the usual explanation when this comes up.

My pharmacist has become my actual doctor and I am at peace with it. Same for me with post editing time limits, unfortunately.

Reference ranges differ between labs, so comparing two reports is close to meaningless. Currently on post editing time limits myself.

Followed, this answered three questions I had. Six weeks in on post editing time limits and it lines up.

Half these threads would be unnecessary with a functioning search box.

Interdose restlessness is distinct from the original symptom and worth naming separately. Same for me with post editing time limits, unfortunately.

Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism. Not on post editing time limits but the pattern is familiar.

Bring a list. Embarrassment makes everyone forget things, including you. Not on post editing time limits but the pattern is familiar.

Fifteen years of this and the function column is the only one that changed anything for me. Also, one page of history, printed, handed over at the start. It changes the appointment.

Half these threads would be unnecessary with a functioning search box. Not on post editing time limits but the pattern is familiar.

Same here.

Print the page.

Did not know half of this. Thanks.