Not medical, not useful, just posting about a re-read.
Everyone is allowed one boring answer.
I have opinions and no expertise.
That is mine.
Reference ranges differ between labs, so comparing two reports is close to meaningless.
Same here.
Not on a re-read but the pattern is familiar.
Depressingly accurate.
Fifteen years of this and the function column is the only one that changed anything for me. Also, one page of history, printed, handed over at the start. It changes the appointment. Same for me with a re-read, unfortunately.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable. Currently on a re-read myself.
Following this because I am in the same place and have no idea what to ask at the appointment.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.
Careful with attribution. You changed the timing, the dose and the season. That is three variables.
Careful with attribution. You changed the timing, the dose and the season. That is three variables.
Worth asking what specifically was measured. Pain scores move with mood and function does not.
This is the correct amount of effort for a thread like this.
This is the correct amount of effort for a thread like this. Same for me with a re-read, unfortunately.
Changing prescriber does not reset anything, and people discover that the hard way.
Is it normal to feel worse before better? Nobody told me that.