A history book, again, because these threads never die and that is the charm.
Small things count more than the big ones.
No spoilers, one line each.
It has been going for years and I hope it never stops.
Everyone is allowed one boring answer.
Your turn.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable. Same for me with a history book, unfortunately.
Depressingly accurate.
The mug is the correct answer and everyone else is wrong.
Reference ranges differ between labs, so comparing two reports is close to meaningless.
Everyone here blames the drug. Half the time it is the appointment schedule, not the molecule.
Depressingly accurate.
How do you tell the difference between the drug working and just a good week?
How do you tell the difference between the drug working and just a good week?
Same.
I was not expecting to be called out by a forum post today.
No. Not on a history book but the pattern is familiar.
Sorry for the basic question, but how do you actually start one of these diaries?
Reference ranges differ between labs, so comparing two reports is close to meaningless. Not on a history book but the pattern is familiar.
No.