An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Read methods. How long have you been on selenium?
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Same here.
How long have you been on selenium?
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Read methods.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions.
This board overrates bloodwork. A number moving is not the outcome you wanted.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions.