Bloodwork question about vitamin D3. Baseline, five years in, and the numbers moved in a direction I did not expect.
I would rather have a narrow conclusion and be right than a broad one and be interesting.
The animal data is stronger than the human data and the human data is not nothing, it is just small.
The interesting question is not whether it works but for whom and at what cost.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? Five years in on vitamin D3 and it lines up.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month. Five years in on vitamin D3 and it lines up.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison. Not on vitamin D3 but the pattern is familiar.
Narrow conclusion.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.
Baseline first.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions.
Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes. Accumulation worry was my main issue with vitamin D3 too.
Same here.
Read methods. Same for me with vitamin D3, unfortunately.