I have been running GHK-Cu for six weeks and the honest summary is that the effect is smaller than the internet suggests and real.
The animal data is stronger than the human data and the human data is not nothing, it is just small.
Posting to be argued with, mainly.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this? How long have you been on GHK-Cu?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites. Not on GHK-Cu but the pattern is familiar.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Read methods.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Narrow conclusion. Same for me with GHK-Cu, unfortunately.
Read methods.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.