Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist. Not on LL-37 but the pattern is familiar.
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites. Not on LL-37 but the pattern is familiar.
Same here.
Baseline first. Same for me with LL-37, unfortunately.
Most of the popular protocol is borrowed from a clinical population and applied to healthy people without comment.
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial. Fatigue was my main issue with LL-37 too.
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.
Cold storage, light protection, date on the vial. Boring, removes half the variables.
Same here.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Read methods.
Baseline first.