Long post, sorry. Hexarelin: what actually has human evidence behind it, and what is extrapolation from animals?
Mechanism is not outcome, and a plausible pathway is the most expensive kind of evidence there is.
Sample size, blinding, and who paid for it. Those three questions kill most of the confidence in most of these threads.
There is a serious question about whether the studied form matches what is sold, and nobody in a thread can answer it.
Would like a narrow answer rather than an enthusiastic one.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? Currently on hexarelin myself.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions.
Name the active ingredient, not just the brand. It makes these threads searchable years later.
Same here.
Same for me with hexarelin, unfortunately.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Baseline first. How long have you been on hexarelin?
This board overrates bloodwork. A number moving is not the outcome you wanted.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this? How long have you been on hexarelin?
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four.