Same here.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything. Injection site reaction was my main issue with PT-141 too.
Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist.
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four. How long have you been on PT-141?
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
Same here.
Same for me with PT-141, unfortunately.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? A fortnight in on PT-141 and it lines up.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.