Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions.
Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
Same here.
How long have you been on PT-141?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything. Injection site reaction was my main issue with PT-141 too.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist. A fortnight in on PT-141 and it lines up.
Same here.
Cold storage, light protection, date on the vial. Boring, removes half the variables.
Baseline first.
This board overrates bloodwork. A number moving is not the outcome you wanted.