Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist.

Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything. Injection site reaction was my main issue with PT-141 too.

Baseline first.

A plausible mechanism is not an outcome, and this class is the textbook example.

Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions. How long have you been on PT-141?

My rule, after years of this: if it cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.

Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration. Currently on PT-141 myself.

Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this? Injection site reaction was my main issue with PT-141 too.

Narrow conclusion.

Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?

Same here.

Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing. Not on PT-141 but the pattern is familiar.

How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?

How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything? Not on PT-141 but the pattern is familiar.

Read methods. Same for me with PT-141, unfortunately.