Trying to separate three different claims about GHK-Cu: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
I have started logging dose, time, and sleep because otherwise the anecdote is just a mood.
Cold storage, light protection, and a date on the vial. Boring, and it removes half the variables.
Most of the popular protocols are borrowed from clinical populations and applied to healthy people without comment.
Mechanism is not outcome, and a plausible pathway is the most expensive kind of evidence there is.
Injection site reactions are trivial until they are not, and a fresh needling technique removes half of them.
Posting to be argued with, mainly.
Baseline first.
Read methods.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Narrow conclusion.
Baseline first. Same for me with GHK-Cu, unfortunately.
A plausible mechanism is not an outcome, and this class is the textbook example.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes. A fortnight in on GHK-Cu and it lines up.
I would take the narrow conclusion. Broad ones are more interesting and less true.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?