Withdrawal, again, because these threads never die and that is the charm. No spoilers, one line each.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.
Fifteen years of this and the function column is the only one that changed anything for me. Also, one page of history, printed, handed over at the start. It changes the appointment.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism.
No wrong answers, and yours is a good one.
You have two changes at once here. You cannot attribute anything until one of them moves. Side effects was my main issue with withdrawal too.
Depressingly accurate.
No.
Interdose restlessness is distinct from the original symptom and worth naming separately.
How do you tell the difference between the drug working and just a good week?
Worth repeating that this is not medical advice and the answer often depends on who you are. Side effects was my main issue with withdrawal too.
I was not expecting to be called out by a forum post today.
Interdose restlessness is distinct from the original symptom and worth naming separately.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.
Same here.
Side effects was my main issue with withdrawal too.