I have been running ginkgo biloba for two months and the honest summary is that the effect is smaller than the internet suggests and real.
Tolerance and underdosing look identical from the inside, which is why the answer is usually a blood test and not more forums.
Cold storage, light protection, and a date on the vial. Boring, and it removes half the variables.
Would like a narrow answer rather than an enthusiastic one.
Same here.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
This is the kind of post the forum exists for.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
Read methods.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Read methods.
Read methods. Not on ginkgo biloba but the pattern is familiar.
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four. Two months in on ginkgo biloba and it lines up.