Trying to separate three different claims about semax: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful. Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? How long have you been on semax?
Read methods.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero? Fatigue was my main issue with semax too.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
Same here.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.
Baseline first.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Baseline first.