Bloodwork question about huperzine A. Baseline, six weeks in, and the numbers moved in a direction I did not expect.
Sample size, blinding, and who paid for it. Those three questions kill most of the confidence in most of these threads.
I have started logging dose, time, and sleep because otherwise the anecdote is just a mood.
The measured outcome and the hoped-for outcome are rarely the same thing in these threads.
What would change your mind about this?
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero? Currently on huperzine A myself.
Narrow conclusion. Same for me with huperzine A, unfortunately.
If it needs three other compounds to notice, you have not tested the first one.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison. How long have you been on huperzine A?
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month. Currently on huperzine A myself.
Baseline first. Not on huperzine A but the pattern is familiar.
Same here.