Long post, sorry. Semax: what actually has human evidence behind it, and what is extrapolation from animals?
Tolerance and underdosing look identical from the inside, which is why the answer is usually a blood test and not more forums.
The comparison group matters more than the compound when the outcome is something as fuzzy as focus.
Most of the popular protocols are borrowed from clinical populations and applied to healthy people without comment.
Would like a narrow answer rather than an enthusiastic one.
Same here.
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid.
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
This is the kind of post the forum exists for.
This is the kind of post the forum exists for. How long have you been on semax?
If it needs three other compounds to notice, you have not tested the first one.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? How long have you been on semax?
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration. How long have you been on semax?
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at. Not on semax but the pattern is familiar.
Baseline first.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything. How long have you been on semax?