I have been running lion mane for three years and the honest summary is that the effect is smaller than the internet suggests and real.
Narrow conclusion.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison. Three years in on lion mane and it lines up.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? Not on lion mane but the pattern is familiar.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
My rule, after years of this: if it cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Baseline first.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything. How long have you been on lion mane?
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
My rule, after years of this: if it cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial.
Read methods. How long have you been on lion mane?