Same here.

I would stop trying to convey how bad it is and start saying what you want them to do. Not on a coffee grinder but the pattern is familiar.

Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable. Six weeks in on a coffee grinder and it lines up.

You have two changes at once here. You cannot attribute anything until one of them moves. Six weeks in on a coffee grinder and it lines up.

Depressingly accurate.

No wrong answers, and yours is a good one.

Fifteen years of this and the function column is the only one that changed anything for me. Also, one page of history, printed, handed over at the start. It changes the appointment.

I would stop trying to convey how bad it is and start saying what you want them to do.

Same shape here, different drug. The thing that helped was documenting the refusal rather than re-arguing it. They refer rather than write.

Correct. Tolerance was my main issue with a coffee grinder too.

Reference ranges differ between labs, so comparing two reports is close to meaningless.

Correct, and also rude.

Changing prescriber does not reset anything, and people discover that the hard way.

Following this because I am in the same place and have no idea what to ask at the appointment. Not on a coffee grinder but the pattern is familiar.

How do you tell the difference between the drug working and just a good week?