Nebido (undecanoate) at what most people describe as a standard dose gave me raised haematocrit for the first 10 days.
The comparison group matters more than the compound when the outcome is something as fuzzy as focus.
What the anabolic class does pharmacologically does not require the subjective effect to be large to be real.
There is a serious question about whether the studied form matches what is sold, and nobody in a thread can answer it.
Haematocrit creep is the boring one that catches people at the six week mark.
Anyone got a paper worth reading on this rather than a write-up of a paper?
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
This is the kind of post the forum exists for. How long have you been on undecanoate?
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
Read methods.
A plausible mechanism is not an outcome, and this class is the textbook example.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes. Same for me with undecanoate, unfortunately.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Same here.
Two months in on undecanoate and it lines up.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison. How long have you been on undecanoate?
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?