I have been running anastrozole for two months and the honest summary is that the effect is smaller than the internet suggests and real.
Tolerance and underdosing look identical from the inside, which is why the answer is usually a blood test and not more forums.
There is a serious question about whether the studied form matches what is sold, and nobody in a thread can answer it.
Interested in the methods more than the conclusion.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Same here.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread.
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.
Read methods. Currently on anastrozole myself.
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
Baseline first.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
A plausible mechanism is not an outcome, and this class is the textbook example.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
I would take the narrow conclusion. Broad ones are more interesting and less true.