I have been running testosterone propionate for three years and the honest summary is that the effect is smaller than the internet suggests and real.
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
My rule now: if a claim cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
The last two weeks of a cycle and the first month after it are where most people feel worst.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation start?
Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison. Acne was my main issue with testosterone propionate too.
Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
My rule, after years of this: if it cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing. Currently on testosterone propionate myself.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
Same here.
Narrow conclusion.
Baseline first. Three years in on testosterone propionate and it lines up.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything? Acne was my main issue with testosterone propionate too.
Read methods.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
Same here.
Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.