Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Same here.
Same here.
Read methods.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
This is the kind of post the forum exists for.
Narrow conclusion.
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
I would take the narrow conclusion. Broad ones are more interesting and less true.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?