Long post, sorry. HCG: what actually has human evidence behind it, and what is extrapolation from animals? Two weeks is not enough time to attribute anything to a compound unless the effect is dramatic.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
Same here.
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything? Not on hCG but the pattern is familiar.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything. Side effects was my main issue with hCG too.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? Currently on hCG myself.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
Same here.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.
Baseline first.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
Baseline first.